12 June Drugged Driving June 12, 2017By Jon Coss - Blog Manager General Drugged Driving, DUI, Field Sobriety 0 As a resident of California, I took personal interest in a recent bill introduced to the legislature that would create a drugged driving task force and the use of oral swabs to help identify drivers under the influence of drugs. Californians, after all, approved the use of recreational marijuana in last November’s elections.This bill follows a recent study showing that drugged driving deaths have now passed drunk driving deaths, with a whopping 43% of fatalities in 2015 showing the use of a legal or illegal drug. This all makes me wonder just how lawmakers, law enforcement, and the courts are going to handle field sobriety tests in the future. After all, the cheek swab test used to test for cannabis cannot test for alcohol and many other drugs. And we’ve written on this blog many times about the dangers of and rise in the use of opioids. With all these “choices”, it appears that officers may need to administer multiple tests (alcohol, opioids, cannabis, etc.) to identify potential influences affecting a driver.While it would be nice to think that drivers would act responsibly, history shows us this is not the case. In Colorado, for example, CDOT conducted a study that revealed that 55% of marijuana users believed it was safe to drive under the influence of marijuana. And the number of fatalities with active THC has increased 250% from 2013 – 2015. While I know that this doesn’t necessarily prove causation, to me at least, it certainly provides reasons for concern. Related Posts Cigarette Fraud Last week we wrote about charges being brought against a group of alleged fraudsters in California that were trucking thousands of cans and bottles into California to collect the state’s recycling refunds. This week, just so no one feels left out, we’re bringing you a story from the East Coast that deals with cigarette fraud. That’s right… cigarette fraud.As you probably already know, the price of cigarettes varies dramatically from state to state because of the taxes imposed by each state government. For example, in Virginia, where the state has an excise tax of only $0.17 per pack, the average price for a pack of cigarettes is $5.25. New York, on the other hand, adds taxes of $4.35 per pack helping to drive the average price per pack to $12.85. That’s a difference per pack of $7.60.So what does an enterprising fraudster do? Buy cigarettes in Virginia and sell them in New York of course. This is illegal but it apparently didn’t prevent a 26 year old man from driving through Pennsylvania with 7,750 packs of cigarettes purchased in Virginia. That’s over 150,000 individual cigarettes so likely not just for his personal use. That might explain why the Pennsylvania state trooper who pulled him over said the driver was “very nervous, shaking and avoiding eye contact with me at all cost.”The man is now free on bail but facing felony charges. I guess you never know what’s in the truck you pass on the freeway. Last week it was aluminum cans and plastic bottles. This week it’s thousands of cartons of cigarettes. Next week? A Reminder of Government’s Important Role in Helping Americans Regular readers of this blog know that we often focus our comments on the fraud and abuses in government subsidy programs. Our intent is almost always to point out solutions that can make these programs more effective, rather than to question the existence of the programs altogether. In fact, most Pondera employees worked for government agencies in the past and recognize the good that many programs deliver.The recent fires in California provide an example of government programs helping Americans in need. The fires, which tore through California’s wine country, including Napa and Sonoma, claimed over 40 lives and 7,000 structures, and displaced nearly 100,000 people. Entire neighborhoods were destroyed leaving families scrambling for shelter and food.A number of government agencies sprang into action to help those affected by the disaster. While most Americans are somewhat familiar with, for example, how FEMA responds to disasters, other efforts are less obvious but very important.For example, I took note of the combined efforts of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) to provide emergency food assistance to local residents. Using the Disaster Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (D-SNAP), CDSS offered a month of food benefits to those who qualify. This is in addition to other waivers such as allowing existing SNAP beneficiaries to purchase hot foods (many lost their homes and by extension their ability to prepare foods).Events like the fires in California, while heartbreaking, also provide us with a reminder of the important work done by federal and state government agencies. This is also a time to remember the important work that agencies do throughout the year to support Americans who truly need our assistance. We believe our job at Pondera is to help governments deliver better services by driving fraud, waste, and abuse out of their programs. Comment (0) Comments are closed.